Cited by 232Bioenergy crop production and managementForest Biomass Utilization and ManagementBioeconomy and Sustainability Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops

Abstract

Global energy use projections predict that biomass will be an important source of renewable energy in the coming decades. Short-rotation woody crops will be the prime source of this biomass. However, the sustainability of woody crops has been questioned. Using internationally accepted forest sustainability criteria, an assessment of willow biomass crops indicates that they are sustainable compared to agricultural land and the fossil fuel-based energy systems they will replace. Assessing each criterion also reveals aspects of willow crop systems that should be addressed to further improve sustainability. Biological characteristics and management of willow create a structurally diverse habitat for an array of species and protect soil and water resources. Biomass from willow crops can be used to produce energy with no net addition of CO2 to the atmosphere. The implementation of good management practices will maintain productivity over multiple rotations. Rural development and environmental benefits associated with deployment and use will accrue to the local community because of the willow system's short supply chain. The economic valuation of these benefits are necessary for the deployment of woody crops, which in turn can help society become more sustainable.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0411:gfasao]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 29 · Cited by 232

Metadata

Authors
Volk, T. A., Verwijst, T., Tharakan, P. J., Abrahamson, L. P., & White, E. H.
Affiliations
  • SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Volk, Timothy A.
  • Tharakan, Pradeep J.
  • Abrahamson, Lawrence P.
  • White, Edwin H.
Venue
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10
Volume
2
Issue
8
Pages
411-418
ISSN
1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2136767666
Cited by
232
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
FWCI
15.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
Keywords
short rotation woody crops, renewable energy, bioenergy, carbon neutrality, biodiversity habitat, soil and water protection, rural development, short supply chains, economic valuation of environmental benefits

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002%5B0411:gfasao%5D2.0.co;2
The paper
Volk, T. A., Verwijst, T., Tharakan, P. J., Abrahamson, L. P., & White, E. H. (2004). Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002%5B0411%3Agfasao%5D2.0.co%3B2