The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops
Abstract
Global energy use projections predict that biomass will be an important source of renewable energy in the coming decades. Short-rotation woody crops will be the prime source of this biomass. However, the sustainability of woody crops has been questioned. Using internationally accepted forest sustainability criteria, an assessment of willow biomass crops indicates that they are sustainable compared to agricultural land and the fossil fuel-based energy systems they will replace. Assessing each criterion also reveals aspects of willow crop systems that should be addressed to further improve sustainability. Biological characteristics and management of willow create a structurally diverse habitat for an array of species and protect soil and water resources. Biomass from willow crops can be used to produce energy with no net addition of CO2 to the atmosphere. The implementation of good management practices will maintain productivity over multiple rotations. Rural development and environmental benefits associated with deployment and use will accrue to the local community because of the willow system's short supply chain. The economic valuation of these benefits are necessary for the deployment of woody crops, which in turn can help society become more sustainable.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“It has been proposed that C sequestration under PECs should be at least 0.25 Mg C ha−1 year−1 in order to make the crop C-neutral when converted to biofuel [7].”
From Carbon Sequestration by Perennial Energy Crops: Is the Jury Still Out? (2015) · cites this paper as [7]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 232
Metadata
- Authors
- Volk, T. A., Verwijst, T., Tharakan, P. J., Abrahamson, L. P., & White, E. H.
- Affiliations
- SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
- Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE)
- Corresponding author
- Volk, Timothy A.
- Tharakan, Pradeep J.
- Abrahamson, Lawrence P.
- White, Edwin H.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 411-418
- ISSN
- 1540-9295 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2136767666
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 15.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Forest Biomass Utilization and Management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Bioeconomy and Sustainability Development
- Keywords
- short rotation woody crops, renewable energy, bioenergy, carbon neutrality, biodiversity habitat, soil and water protection, rural development, short supply chains, economic valuation of environmental benefits
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002%5B0411:gfasao%5D2.0.co;2
- The paper
- Volk, T. A., Verwijst, T., Tharakan, P. J., Abrahamson, L. P., & White, E. H. (2004). Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002%5B0411%3Agfasao%5D2.0.co%3B2